Paper Review Form

1. Reviewer’s expertise: How well do you know the paper’s subject topics?

    ( Required )

2. Briefly describe the paper and its contributions to robotics science and systems.

    ( Required, Visible To Author After Decision Notification )

3. Mention what you have learned from the paper.

    ( Required, Visible To Author After Decision Notification )

4. Quality Score: This score reflects your assessment of the overall quality of the paper.

    ( Required, Visible To Author After Decision Notification )

    Excellent (among the most interesting papers you have read over the past year)
    Very Good (a solid paper that makes an important contribution)
    Good (a paper that has its flaws but makes a good contribution)
    Fair (a paper that is on its way to making a good contribution but not there yet)
    Poor (a paper that needs significant work)

5. Impact and Novelty: This work explores novel problems and/or techniques and/or systems that would potentialy have impact on a subset of the robotics community.

    ( Checkbox )
    ( Required, Visible To Author After Decision Notification )

    Strongly agree
    Somewhat agree
    Neither agree nor disagree
    Somewhat disagree
    Strongly disagree

6. Explain your rating by discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the submission, contributions, and the potential impact of the paper. Include suggestions for improvement as appropriate. Be thorough, fair, and constructive.

    ( Required, Visible To Author after Notification )

7. You may enter private comments for the program committee here. These comments will not be sent to the paper author(s). Please do not mention any other papers that are currently in review, or the names of people associated with these papers.

    ( Optional )